Pickup groups and why I hate them
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 7:43 am
I really do hate pickup groups cause you never know what your gonna get (Forest Gump voice). However, in order to ease my mind I am asking you guys what you think about a situation that happened last night. Myself, Arramen, Ysiermo, and Zorbinafrii started a group to run the HK instance. We searched and invited people to fill the remaining spots. Now mind you, this is our group so I figure they either agree to our rules or don't group.
There were two Jedi in the group, Arramen and Tojo (not of RID). Another person was in the group but had a Jedi alt. Arramen and I used to do instances a lot with a Rebel guild that befriended us and I learned a lot from them. They had a great loot structure that I chose to adhere to.
1) Guild members get first call on loot
2) Loot is called by profession and only if needed
3) No calling for alts
4) If nobody needs it then we roll for it
We even left it on free for all since there was nothing No-Trade in the instances, and happily traded it to whoever needed it. No muss, no fuss and no problems. So I bring you to the situation that happened last night.
One person says he wants the JMC for his alt if it drops, but nobody else calls anything. In fact there is no calling for this instance at all, we agreed to set it to random. So we set random loot (mind you when it is set to random you decide to accept it or leave the group) until we get to HK and then do Lottery since some people already had the YT-2400 and that is a no-trade item. Zorbinafrii looted a black JMC (Yah, I know u want it Corv and I'm sure we can trade it for a brown one if u loot it hehe). Because nobody actually needs this item following our rules, Zorb won it fair and square. Furthermore, the JMC sells for 90 mil so it is just as wanted by a non-jedi as it is a jedi. Unfortunately two people in the group threw a fit saying that they needed to roll for it because it wasn't fair that he received it on random loot. I disagreed and said that it is fair, random loot is nothing but an auto-roll. The only difference between random loot and lottery is the ability to choose whether or not to roll for the item(s). Now Zorb was going to hand it over to them, but I sent him a tell saying not to do it. He traded the JMC to me so he could stay out of it. Of course I am just holding on to this for Zorb, I'm not actually keeping it. The loot was then set to lottery and Ysiermo won the YT-2400 and other loot from HK-47 which just further pissed people off, but grats Ysiermo!!! I told Zorb to just ignore them and leave the group after we finished. He then logged onto his alt and I took the flak for their complaints. I forget the guys name (I sent it to Lexx) started sending me tells that it was immature and unfair that Zorb kept the JMC. I told him that he won it fairly being that it was given on random loot and that he was acting immature demanding it just because he didn't win. He says he is going to send Lexx a mail, post on the forums and submit a ticket to SOE. Well, I can tell you what SOE is gonna say to that already So I ask you, were we right by not handing it over and are these fair rules? I appreciate your input.
There were two Jedi in the group, Arramen and Tojo (not of RID). Another person was in the group but had a Jedi alt. Arramen and I used to do instances a lot with a Rebel guild that befriended us and I learned a lot from them. They had a great loot structure that I chose to adhere to.
1) Guild members get first call on loot
2) Loot is called by profession and only if needed
3) No calling for alts
4) If nobody needs it then we roll for it
We even left it on free for all since there was nothing No-Trade in the instances, and happily traded it to whoever needed it. No muss, no fuss and no problems. So I bring you to the situation that happened last night.
One person says he wants the JMC for his alt if it drops, but nobody else calls anything. In fact there is no calling for this instance at all, we agreed to set it to random. So we set random loot (mind you when it is set to random you decide to accept it or leave the group) until we get to HK and then do Lottery since some people already had the YT-2400 and that is a no-trade item. Zorbinafrii looted a black JMC (Yah, I know u want it Corv and I'm sure we can trade it for a brown one if u loot it hehe). Because nobody actually needs this item following our rules, Zorb won it fair and square. Furthermore, the JMC sells for 90 mil so it is just as wanted by a non-jedi as it is a jedi. Unfortunately two people in the group threw a fit saying that they needed to roll for it because it wasn't fair that he received it on random loot. I disagreed and said that it is fair, random loot is nothing but an auto-roll. The only difference between random loot and lottery is the ability to choose whether or not to roll for the item(s). Now Zorb was going to hand it over to them, but I sent him a tell saying not to do it. He traded the JMC to me so he could stay out of it. Of course I am just holding on to this for Zorb, I'm not actually keeping it. The loot was then set to lottery and Ysiermo won the YT-2400 and other loot from HK-47 which just further pissed people off, but grats Ysiermo!!! I told Zorb to just ignore them and leave the group after we finished. He then logged onto his alt and I took the flak for their complaints. I forget the guys name (I sent it to Lexx) started sending me tells that it was immature and unfair that Zorb kept the JMC. I told him that he won it fairly being that it was given on random loot and that he was acting immature demanding it just because he didn't win. He says he is going to send Lexx a mail, post on the forums and submit a ticket to SOE. Well, I can tell you what SOE is gonna say to that already So I ask you, were we right by not handing it over and are these fair rules? I appreciate your input.