by Szul »Wed Mar 15, 2006 11:06 am
If it was me, I'd strip out all the graphics on just the forums portal pages and leave rest of the pages alone. Forum whores just want to read, scroll and type... not look at an animated graphics rich page. Looks like you're using the Nuke + phpBB package? If you separate out phpBB from the Nuke shell, you should be able to just have a plain jane forum portal that is work computer friendly. Then you can put your original graphics back in and see how they work for people.
Your hard work may look really cool, but if its unviewable, its not worth having... all trial and error finding a balance between a cool website and how well it works for the average viewer. Even the smallest GIF animation costs CPU cycles on the viewing machine. For some reason, Flash animations are hell these days on some machines. I have problems with some Flash ads that are really graphic intensive, there was a Spiderman 2 for PS2 ad that used to all but crash IE for me, but your animations seem ok for me.
edit: As an added note, its not that the page takes a while to load for me, 6-8 mbps cable, but its the page scrolling that seems a little choppy in the upper areas of the page, where it has to load the Flash anis as well as the ani GIFs and marquee boxes. Seems like too much animation in one viewable area of the page, plus the page looks to be set for a 1280 screen, not 1024.
If it was me, I'd strip out all the graphics on just the forums portal pages and leave rest of the pages alone. Forum whores just want to read, scroll and type... not look at an animated graphics rich page. Looks like you're using the Nuke + phpBB package? If you separate out phpBB from the Nuke shell, you should be able to just have a plain jane forum portal that is [i]work computer friendly[/i]. Then you can put your original graphics back in and see how they work for people.
Your hard work may look really cool, but if its unviewable, its not worth having... all trial and error finding a balance between a cool website and how well it works for the average viewer. Even the smallest GIF animation costs CPU cycles on the viewing machine. For some reason, Flash animations are hell these days on some machines. I have problems with some Flash ads that are really graphic intensive, there was a [i]Spiderman 2 for PS2[/i] ad that used to all but crash IE for me, but your animations seem ok for me.
edit: As an added note, its not that the page takes a while to load for me, 6-8 mbps cable, but its the page scrolling that seems a little choppy in the upper areas of the page, where it has to load the Flash anis as well as the ani GIFs and marquee boxes. Seems like too much animation in one viewable area of the page, plus the page looks to be set for a 1280 screen, not 1024.